HOME | DD

inktopia avatar

inktopia — Viewing Angles


Viewing Angles
#watercolour #traditionalart #space #aquarelle #celestial #cradle #nebula #star #starfactory #starry #starrynight #starrysky #stars #watercolorpainting #conenebula #emissionnebula #aquarellepainting #starcradle #stellarcradle #absorptionnebula
Published: 2025-11-28 17:05:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 1790; Favourites: 59; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description

The Cone Nebula takes its cone shape from an absorption nebula (that is, a dark nebula)  positioned in front of a faint emission nebula which glows in the background. 

The nebula is part of a much larger star forming complex, here especially concentrated in the cone’s tip. 

Which poses the question: 

How would it all look if either of these were positioned slightly differently? 

It is a nearly pointless question of course. 

Because in reality, wouldn't anything celestial look vastly different with just a few small differences in angle? 

Ever seen a constellation from the side? 

“The universe has no centre”, Giordano Bruno said, continuing that “the reason it feels like the Earth is the centre around which everything circles, is that we watch the universe from the Earth, and that the Earth itself circles around its axis.” 

(Somewhat paraphrased, the text itself going by the name of De L’Infinito Universo et 

Mondi, was written as a dialogue, modelled on Plato's renderings of Socrates:) 

“Philotheo: This is precisely what those see who dwell on the moon and on the other stars in this same space, whether they be earths or suns.

Elpino: Suppose then for the moment that the motion of our earth causeth the appearance of daily world motion, and that by her own diverse motions the earth causeth all those motions which seem to appertain to the innumerable stars,[...]”

Etc. 

Yeah. 

There are those who claim that he was burnt for this, but in reality, judging by the substantial court documents from the multiple trials leading up to his execution… 

And from which, the final result of six reasons has of course gone lost to time, because of course… 

This does not seem to be a problem. 

Now, when he claimed that all the stars were suns like our own, with planets orbiting them, on which life could exist however… that was worse. 

That was probably the only “scientific” point on a list of otherwise purely religious reasons for his death. 

Then again who knows. 

Still.

You look at these nebulae, whose complete image really consists of two different nebulae superimposed on top of each other... 

And you think of Bruno. 

“How would this look from a different angle?” 

Related content

Comments (4)