HOME | DD
bunnyLee β
54
[NSFW]
Published: 2012-06-19 17:57:55 +0000 UTC; Views: 17365; Favourites: 371; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Model: RyanDo not use without permission.
Related content
Comments: 165
I have used it here: [link] Thank you very much. It isn't perfect--it was done in class, so I had to rush on the breasts and such, but I hope I portrayed her beauty in an accurate light.
π: 0 β©: 1
She's very intense. Makes me think of T'Pal, the Vulcan.
π: 0 β©: 0
such a challenging look, like she's daring you to doubt her, absolutely breath-taking
π: 0 β©: 0
I just keep coming back to this. Powerful. Direct. Unapologetic. Well modeled and well photographed.
π: 0 β©: 0
May I please use this as a drawing reference? I would not profit, not copy your photo exactly.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, of course.
π: 0 β©: 1
my god . . . it is just a naked person . . .
truely worthy of engless praise, for being naked . . . the outfit that every human has . . .
π: 0 β©: 2
I am perfectly grown up
thing is though, I dont see artistic merit in the repetition of this same constant thing . . . almost all possible moods and people of any body type have been photographed, it is just boring at this point and lets get real . . . the phographer doesnt do anything!
the artistic merit of this image is mostly that of the woman herself . . . purely her skill at conveying emotion and her own beauty . . .
being black and white sure as hell doesnt make it art, because when I think of creativity I dont think of "lack of color"
does it establish mood . . . sure . . . but why does the mood need to be established? what is the purpose of this woman being naked!
this image has almost no substance . . .
I am not complaining of nudity, I am complaining that it is completely devoid of any creative or original thought.
π: 0 β©: 5
"The photographer doesn't do anything!" on one hand, but challenged with there being no original thought, the response is "that is such bullshit, and even if it were true it doesnt mean we shouldnt try!"
Nope. No disconnect there. At all. None.
π: 0 β©: 0
Thankyou! someone else who understands!
Why does a naked woman get so popular?!
π: 0 β©: 0
that is such bullshit, and even if it were true it doesnt mean we shouldnt try!
π: 0 β©: 1
I am not blind, I just see things very veeeery differently!
do you understand influence?
Here is a good example, 100 years ago Edgar Rice Burroughs read Gullivar of Mars
and he hated it with every fiber of his being, he knew that the story didnt need to suck . . . so he determined to do better . . .
he wrote princess of mars first published in 1912 . . . .
I just see things differently, influence isnt just from the good things that we see . . . but from the naegative . ..
I know nothing is 100% original, but . . . embracing unoriginality is worse . . .
it is very complicated, but you cant simply not criticize, because of some bullshit logic!
if we dont criticize, art doesnt grow, the mind of all humans they wobble and flow. . . colored by times all futures and pasts . . .
In short, I will bitch all I want!
π: 0 β©: 0
you try to make sens to the non sens. your reaction show that this is art or whatever it is.
π: 0 β©: 1
You have a pathetic and incorrect definition of art, I pity you and the sad world you live in.
π: 0 β©: 1
A definition is just a consensus about the meaning of something. Shit rules that limit your view of the world. Keep throwing your semantics.
π: 0 β©: 1
rules exsist for a reason, if we dont guide ourselves we cant grow as people.
if we cant get past "naked womenz am be art" how can we grow as artists?
π: 0 β©: 1
You want people to grow on your own term , you are going to be disappointed a lot.
π: 0 β©: 0
Hidden by Admin
π: 0 β©: 0
love the grey and how its lit up, looks a bit like your number 40 pic in the grey...wow wonderful pic.
π: 0 β©: 0
I love, love, love this photo! Compelling expression . . . hard to stop looking at it!
π: 0 β©: 0
Despite that it's a nude, which i dont really enjoy (as a whole genre), her petite face and small chin help me realize that i tend to make my woman (painting) too masculine. This is one of the first OBVIOUS sights of the chin being very small and pointy and still being proportional to her face 
however, i'm compelled to know why the left rib cage has that shadow? I have seen many nudes (stock, models, otherwise) and it seems to be a ongoing detail in many nude photographs. (where at least on rib has that same shadow- perhaps not always on the same side though)
I realize, based on other shadows, perhaps the lighting is slightly off the side? but i wouldn't think it would always be 'slightly off' in every photograph 
π: 0 β©: 1
For many women, the rib cage is asymmetrical and on one side (usually the left) sticks out further. I don't know why it is; maybe it's because of the heart?
Anyways, impressive for you to consistanly pick up on an element like that
π: 0 β©: 1
i've seen images from Miss Mosh and OpheliaOverdose and many times i see their left ribs sticking out more than the right (for no obvious lighting reasons)
π: 0 β©: 0
wait. where are those gorgeous pixieΒ΄s long eartips?
π: 0 β©: 0
I really didn't think that there will be any negative comments here. It's an excellent photography - great model, awesome textures and lights, it's very simple and very interesting at the same time. What can be wrong with it?
Congrats on DD, your gallery is amazing and unique!
π: 0 β©: 1
I really didn't think that there would* be any negative comments here.
Oh dear, my English sucks. Sorry guys
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm not 18 yet, and so I cannot see this. But by reading the other comments, I'm sure it's a beautiful picture. And I'm sure the model is ever so goregeous. Congrats on the DD, you deserved it!
Also, just take the negative comments as constructive critisism
π: 0 β©: 1
Well based on the amount of comments saying how they love it, and the fact that she got a DD, then I can safely assume it's good. 
π: 0 β©: 0
Excellent choice of DD. Her face, eyes, cheekbones ... Stunning! The forcefulness of her stance is strength personified...
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm confused, how is a picture that is nothing but a black and white shot of a naked woman worthy of a DD? How is it even art at all? It makes not sense to me
π: 0 β©: 3
Well maybe what bunnyLee sees as artistic, you may not.
Everyone see's things differently, and maybe to you, a black and white naked woman isn't art, but to other's it's beautiful.
π: 0 β©: 0
There is no such thing as "worthy" of a dd, as it is not an award, or reward, but rather a feature of something I found interesting. That said, please take up any issues you have with what I'm featuring with me personally, rather than leaving rude comments for the artist, who had nothing to do with my selection.
FAQ #873: What do I do when I disapprove of a Daily Deviation feature?
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm not trying to be rude, or trying to get this taken down, I'm merely asking a question. One that I would appreciate a genuine answer to.
I apologize that I sounded rude, I did not mean to give that impression.
π: 0 β©: 2
You'll find my reason for featuring this in the DD comments above. If you have any further questions about why I chose to feature something, please address them with me personally.
π: 0 β©: 0
I understand what you mean - while I don't have any particular problem with this picture, I agree that many DDs simply aren't particularly note-worthy.
π: 0 β©: 1
1 | Next =>