HOME | DD
Published: 2006-06-06 13:38:54 +0000 UTC; Views: 1037; Favourites: 11; Downloads: 147
Redirect to original
Description
The term disintegration constant, in the strict sense, is a proportionality constant in the mathematical equation that describes the rate of radioactive decay. All radioactive decay can be expressed quite well with statistics…which is pretty interesting, if you think about the fact that the process of radioactive decay at the individual level is a spontaneous disintegration of an atomic nucleus. Each disintegration event itself is random. Again, we see this notion of tiny random events at the smallest level taking a definable and predictable form in large scales.What’s even more interesting about radioactive decay itself is that it’s happening all the time, all around you. Cinder blocks, for instance, are radioactive. Bananas contain trace amounts of the radionuclide potassium-40. Even human beings themselves have radioactive isotopes in their bodies from birth. Radioactivity is everywhere. (Fortunately for us, the cells in our bodies are able to repair the small amounts of damage caused by the radioactivity we’re exposed to on a daily basis).
It can be said that in a broader sense, on a long enough timescale, almost everything disintegrates. With the exception of the fundamental particles of electrons, protons, photons, and neutrinos, all particles are subject to decay. It may not happen quickly, but it most likely will happen.
Related content
Comments: 22
aeddan [2008-12-01 02:49:43 +0000 UTC]
Nice series.
One nitpick, though: over significantly long timescales (10^1,000,000 years or more), even elementary particles such as electrons will decay even further into quarks, gluons, etc.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
welder In reply to aeddan [2008-12-04 05:53:59 +0000 UTC]
Hmm. Proton decay is a theoretical idea but there is no evidence for it, all attempts to observe it so far have failed. I think electron decay and photon decay are less plausible than proton decay. I don't doubt that on such a ridiculously long timescale it could happen. But I'm not sure it's quite fair to make a claim like that as a certainty.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
AngelicLawyer [2006-06-26 12:41:44 +0000 UTC]
Once again, the inevitability of Physics astounds me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
welder In reply to pdtnc [2006-06-11 02:57:27 +0000 UTC]
Nah, not now...I used to be (well, I used to be one in training anyways )
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
welder In reply to m0nni [2006-06-09 01:24:34 +0000 UTC]
Heh...it took me way too long to set up that lighting, so thanks for noticing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
alelale [2006-06-08 03:58:37 +0000 UTC]
i think i have that physics book. the concept is very
interesting, kinda compelling, y'know, "everything is
bound to erode."
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
rettaw [2006-06-07 20:04:12 +0000 UTC]
Disintegration constant was an odd name, I've always heard decay constant. What book IS that ?
Also, as far as I know, everything below Carbon (or thereabouts) is stable, since from there it's uphill energywhise to the lighter elements.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
welder In reply to rettaw [2006-06-08 02:54:59 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, when we think of stable elements those normally aren't what we say would undergo radioactive decay. I'm thinking more along the timeline of the age of the universe....pretty much the only things guaranteed not to decay are elementary particles.
The book? Can't remember off the top of my head, some generic title lie "Introduction to Modern Physics or something." But yeah, decay constant is the more common usage. Doesn't sound quite as good for artistic purposes though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ruvsk [2006-06-07 06:26:18 +0000 UTC]
it will take a bit to read the rest of the book
nice idea.
as always!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FreakyLaurent [2006-06-06 20:18:22 +0000 UTC]
Great concept
Like the way it's nicely detailed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
welder In reply to rwirtz [2006-06-07 03:11:36 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I spent a lot of time on this series. Thanks for noticing
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
niper [2006-06-06 16:28:01 +0000 UTC]
This is such an interesting series. The ways you've chosen the represent all of the concepts are fantastic, and the information boxes along with them? Very very fun to read. Great work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
1





















