HOME | DD
Trycon1980 β The Generic Poster
#4k #generic #poster #videogames #sourcefilmmaker
Published: 2016-10-25 18:18:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 2933; Favourites: 50; Downloads: 10
Redirect to original
Description
Infinite Warfare
jk
Related content
Comments: 36
Not Fair since you repeat that gross word a lot of times.
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
Eh,I'd buy it.
(I enjoyed the Section 8 games)
π: 0 β©: 0
To be honest, I found that Infinite Warfare was more enjoyable to me than something like Halo 5, and it really pains me to say that. For once, CoD did Halo better than Halo, but for 343 that's kind of a given.
For some reason, I actually didn't mind playing the game at all, primarily because I waited for its price to go down to like $25. It at least tried to be something better than the M-dub rinse and repeats that were MW2 and MW3, and a VAST improvement over the abortion that was CoD: Ghosts. It's kind of the same reason I liked Advanced Warfare's gameplay, but on the aspect that its designs were a little bit cooler--even if some of them were ripped right off of Halo--and it at least had a little more feeling behind the characters. We can all agree that we cared the most about Ethan, can't we?
It's pretty damn good for some generic sci-fi models though. I really hope people get around to porting more of them.
π: 0 β©: 1
Indeed, Comrade.
π: 0 β©: 0
Why does the picture look like that it was the reskinned version of Soldier 76 of Overwatch?
π: 0 β©: 0
For a parody, this is really damn cool looking! Is this the Section 8 models? I remember downloading a S8 pack weeks ago, but since there are apparently two or three of the same model packs by different people, which one(s) are the best to use for posters and such for SFM?
π: 0 β©: 1
I used these models for the poster (tho their from gmod so you'll have to port them over)
steamcommunity.com/sharedfilesβ¦
steamcommunity.com/sharedfilesβ¦
π: 0 β©: 0
Not Ripped, HATER!
π: 0 β©: 1
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-
No.
doesn't explain why they lost 50% of their average calculated sales. 50% of gains in the market, or perhaps more, is required to break even, and is certainly going to hurt attempts to bring the series out of the hole they've dug if their gains are as much as the money spent developing it, despite its 3% potential margin of error.
certainly, they must listen to the statistics
www.cgmagonline.com/2016/11/25β¦
www.eurogamer.net/articles/201β¦
www.playstationlifestyle.net/2β¦
www.google.com/#q=black+ops+3+β¦
Being generous, let's say Infinite warfare used as much revenue as the smash hit Black Ops...that should be around $21,875,000 which was required to break even, done in 1.5 hours, not considering that IW is next gen and has raised costs due to the graphics, mechanics, etc. BO3 only lost around a fifth when compared to the original BO's total gains of around 30.35 million copies (1.82 billion in revenue gained) climaxing at around 24 million (1.44 billion).Β
if around 22 million dollars was spent making IW, and 50% of those revenues, when compared to Black ops gains of 1.44 billion dollars, means that only 720 million is coming back, with a margin of error expressing that as much as 741.6 million or as little as 698.4 million will return to the developers.
but this is under normal circumstances...
We have yet to consider that investors who, put modestly, would like at least like 10% of those sales given back. And by far the biggest factor to this is Activision's involvementβa large conglomerate of companies funded by a mother company, and in return, the mother company is paid back by the sister companies.
COD's developers would still be in the clear, with at least some 600 million coming back, but Activision would see this as a franchise that is failing. if they expect another title next year, despite the vocal resistance given by gamers, the hypothetical title could potentially total at least 30% less of IW's gains. then less. then less. until they would barely break even. This trend was why, for example, (Ubisoft's) Assassin's Creed's developers have postponed making another title. gamers would have less time to enjoy the last game, then the one before as another comes out, then another bites the dust as yet another comes out the next year.
What would be the point buying games from a franchise if they have little time to develop a positive association with that said game, knowing that there is going to be something better and hopefully not as REDUNDANT the next year.
There is no point.
This is why Halo, BF, Crysis, Warhammer 40k, and many more were able to survive. Either because they give gamers more time to enjoy a game, or they release a variety of categorized games related to a loose franchise.
Optimistically, Activision may intentionally postpone development of COD for at least two or three years, but knowing you and your type, and how much I'm itching to scare people like you, the worst they could do is completely shut the franchise down, like they did with Neversoft's Tony Hawk series, RedOctane's Guitar Hero series, and Gray Matters COD expansions.
Notice a trend?
These franchises, at a time, took an expansive helm in media and in people's lives, but due to their redundancy in the market by a rate of a game or more each year, they were eventually shut down by their merger Activision. if COD kiddies are unfortunate, Infinity Ward may be joining them soon.
Take heed, rookie, for now a winner is you...if your beloved franchise can survive the next few years.
Take heed...
Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β -JD
PS: Now it's your turn to speak. What do you think about my extensive and potentially freakish calculations. I would be TRULY amazed if you read this fully. At least you would have cared to consider the opposition as credible (at least by an ounce). I do not wish to offend you, but simultaneously, you must see what I, and probably many others, have seen as a huge stumble in the market. For this, I thank you. And I mean it.
π: 0 β©: 1
StillΒ lost because I don't care about the percentage, I only care if the game is and lives up what we promised years ago.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well then. I'm not surprised by your persistance. Not sure alot of gamers wished to have yet another futuristic shooter, as many complain. And I suppose my earlier comment stating the franchise might not last very long doesn't apply here either. Ignorance is bliss, I suppose...not saying you are ignorant...or you might be, since you outright say YOU LOST. At least give my efforts a few props, eh?
π: 0 β©: 1
A Call of Duty fan would not do what a childish player those, as we players fight for the line of duty and serve for our country against the best, allowing Battlefield to work together in unity.
π: 0 β©: 1
Wait...what?
If you mean we should all get along, this must be achieved, indeed.
but...am I misinterpreting this?
π: 0 β©: 2
philippinerookie.deviantart.coβ¦
Lets see if you get triggered on this link.
π: 0 β©: 0
I guess, but I prove my point, right?
π: 0 β©: 2
No...I just don't understand your comments.
π: 0 β©: 1
Honestly...I don't know. You just said a few words and left. Not like you read my entire statistical comment a while ago, according to your response.
All I know is on metacritic, thought the critics liked it, the people didn't. This was again due to the reasons I listed earlier.
π: 0 β©: 1
totally looks legit/professional quality game art right there
π: 0 β©: 0
"shooting people 10: the bullets come out of the gun"
noice poster btw
π: 0 β©: 0
fffffffffffffffffffffucking amazing.
i've got no words.
π: 0 β©: 0
1