HOME | DD

timid-wolf avatar timid-wolf — Going nowhere Fast
Going nowhere Fast
Published: 2008-09-29 02:21:17 +0000 UTC; Views: 665; Favourites: 21; Downloads: 9
Redirect to original
Description Love this car ^^
Related content
Comments: 42

Hearsesrock427 [2018-08-23 02:26:55 +0000 UTC]

'60 Delray or Biscayne. Can't be an Impala because it's only got 4 tail lights total. Reminds me a lot of Voodoo in GTA SA! Can't imagine how it ended up all the way out in the woods.... unless it was bought new and something really really expensive broke out of warranty or something. Amazing how you still get the aquatic color vibes, even after all these years.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to Hearsesrock427 [2018-08-23 03:06:54 +0000 UTC]

Normally I would agree, but the badges literally said Impala on each side of the car. So either it is an Impala, or somebody mixed up the badges decades ago.

Lol, me neither. From what I understand there used to be a house nearby, so I'm guessing this was more open 40 to 50 years ago when the thing was parked. And the forest grew up around it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SeberHusky [2012-09-01 00:37:33 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Admin

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to SeberHusky [2012-09-01 00:40:06 +0000 UTC]

Pretty much, yeah. My uncle already took the engine out and most of whatever else was salvageable. This is behind his house, abandoned by a previous owner.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SeberHusky In reply to timid-wolf [2012-09-01 01:12:22 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Admin

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to SeberHusky [2012-09-01 01:20:20 +0000 UTC]

He's a former auto mechanic. Very friendly intelligent guy, and very knowledgeable about cars and salvage. One thing I learned from him is the value of salvage yards.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SeberHusky In reply to timid-wolf [2012-09-01 01:30:44 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Admin

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to SeberHusky [2012-09-01 02:47:54 +0000 UTC]

Yup, green works in more than one way though. Old cars were simpler, built more durably and lasted longer. That's green in that the car remains on the road and in use longer. Added to that, new cars have become more complicated and many components(or the whole) may come from a region of the world with questionable environmental laws and worker treatment. And if a major component breaks the fix is far more expensive, so you're more likely to scrap the car instead.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SeberHusky In reply to timid-wolf [2012-09-01 02:52:44 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Admin

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to SeberHusky [2012-09-01 03:01:15 +0000 UTC]

Lol, yup! Even the late 70's and 80's ones were tanks. When I was younger I saw those things everywhere. And this was the early 90's

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

w-p [2010-05-11 11:09:33 +0000 UTC]

big rusty thing...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to w-p [2010-05-12 01:26:13 +0000 UTC]

yeah

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ahhhscary [2010-01-17 16:18:03 +0000 UTC]

i think it is well past a resto

i mean it has a tree growing out the boot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to ahhhscary [2010-01-17 21:07:01 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I'd imagine. Its pretty badly rusted

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ahhhscary In reply to timid-wolf [2010-01-18 15:51:28 +0000 UTC]

and theres a tree

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to ahhhscary [2010-01-20 00:55:29 +0000 UTC]

The tree actually just looks like its growing out of the trunk. It really isn't

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

darkangel836 [2008-10-18 19:24:51 +0000 UTC]

OMG WHy doesn't someone restore it??? Where is it? I want it...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to darkangel836 [2008-10-19 04:44:44 +0000 UTC]

I know, its a shame isnt it? T_T

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Photo-King [2008-10-03 01:07:02 +0000 UTC]

cool find awsome shot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to Photo-King [2008-10-03 01:31:40 +0000 UTC]

Thank you man ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

QuanticChaos1000 [2008-10-02 04:42:46 +0000 UTC]

Poor 'ol 60 Chev!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to QuanticChaos1000 [2008-10-02 17:28:29 +0000 UTC]

yeah T_T

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TyphlosionsKingdom [2008-10-01 04:37:02 +0000 UTC]

man thats one rusty 1960 bel air!!!!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to TyphlosionsKingdom [2008-10-02 00:58:37 +0000 UTC]

I dont think its a Bel Air

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TyphlosionsKingdom In reply to timid-wolf [2008-10-02 04:29:28 +0000 UTC]

uh........ yeah it is!!! if you think its a impala or a biscayne its not!!! impalas had a stainless rear panel with 6 tailights while biscaynes had just 4 tail lights and the rear panel was painted to match the rest of the body!!!!!! but this car here has 4 tail lights and a white painted rear panel which means this car is a 1960 BEL AIR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to TyphlosionsKingdom [2008-10-02 17:52:21 +0000 UTC]

heres what the front looks like [link]
XD okay its a bel air!! I guess I was thinking of the 1957 model and they changed the design in 1960

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

wannabemustangjockey In reply to timid-wolf [2009-01-01 04:57:42 +0000 UTC]

1957 looks nothing like 1960. Pretty much every Bel Air up through the mid-60s can be easily told apart. The thing is that once the fancier Impala and more basic Biscayne were introduced in 1958, the Bel Air was no longer the top model but rather a middle-range car. This car doesn't have enough side trim to be an Impala, but it has more trim than a Biscayne, and it has only four taillights, so it's a Bel Air. Nothing you didn't already know, I guess.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to wannabemustangjockey [2009-01-01 06:09:12 +0000 UTC]

Nah, man XD. You make me feel kinda stupid to be honest, Lol! I dont know a whole lot about cars

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wannabemustangjockey In reply to timid-wolf [2009-01-02 09:06:21 +0000 UTC]

I wasn't born knowing this stuff. Google and Wikipedia, TV shows and documentaries, automotive books and car magazines and dealer brochures hold the answers. And car shows, and general observation of vehicles on the road. :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to wannabemustangjockey [2009-01-03 06:58:39 +0000 UTC]

I appreciate you saying that, man

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TyphlosionsKingdom In reply to timid-wolf [2008-10-02 18:50:17 +0000 UTC]

they only made the bel air until 1975................

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to TyphlosionsKingdom [2008-10-03 00:05:38 +0000 UTC]

What does that have to do with this conversation?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Cobanay [2008-09-30 22:26:17 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Admin

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Anubis-noise [2008-09-29 19:07:11 +0000 UTC]

So nice...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to Anubis-noise [2008-09-30 04:23:20 +0000 UTC]

Tank you man

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fedini [2008-09-29 14:14:07 +0000 UTC]

love!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to Fedini [2008-09-30 04:23:25 +0000 UTC]

^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

timid-wolf [2008-09-29 02:23:52 +0000 UTC]

anyone notice that sometimes pictures look worse when you upload them?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BIGDOGDAVIDSON In reply to timid-wolf [2010-01-16 16:28:16 +0000 UTC]

it happens to a lot of us. that's why i pump up the contrast in curves, in photoshop before i post anything. It still looks great though so don't worry about that. great shot. dynamic angle. Nicely executed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to BIGDOGDAVIDSON [2010-01-16 23:19:08 +0000 UTC]

Same here. I pump up the saturation and contrast. Thank you, I appreciate it ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BIGDOGDAVIDSON In reply to timid-wolf [2010-01-18 14:38:05 +0000 UTC]

Anything i can do to help out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

timid-wolf In reply to BIGDOGDAVIDSON [2010-01-20 00:55:47 +0000 UTC]

cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


1