HOME | DD
Published: 2012-03-04 09:43:38 +0000 UTC; Views: 16121; Favourites: 155; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Designation:Numerical Designation: HT9A7/IOCY
Name: "Yvernyr" - "Wyvern"
Key Data:
Crew: 3 (Commander, Gunner, Driver)
Cost: 16.7 million NSD
Dimensions:
Length: 8.1m (Hull)/
Height: 2.7m (Turret Roof)
Width: 3.8m (4.2m w/ Modular Side Armour)
Weight: 78t
Performance:
Maximum Speed: 72kph road speed (governed).
Cross country speed: 52kph
Acceleration: 0 to 32kph in 4.8 seconds
Operational Range: 515km
Armament:
Main Armament: 128mm SC10.8 55 calibre solid propellant smoothbore cannon (42 rounds, 25 in autoloader magazine)
Co-axial weapon (left): 20mm Arsenal Karonin M.28 Autocannon (600 rounds)/12.7mm MG/H8A3 (1500 rounds), or other modular block compatible weapons.
Commander's weapon: 12.7mm MG/H8A3 on Remote Weapons System (powered), interchangeable with other armaments.
Additional: 12x mounted multipurpose grenade launchers, modular systems allow for further options.
Protection:
Passive: Calumnis-3 (metal-composite matrix outer layer, NERA, composite tiles, DU alloy mesh, IRHA plates/hull, fibreglass/rubber/Spectra spall liner)
Active: Solothel Active Protection System
Crew Protection: NBC protection (main + auxiliary), pentafluoroethane crew compartment fire extinguishing, Halon 1301 + foam fuel tank extinguishing and self-sealing suite.
Electronics:
Io FCS
SAIC Combat Networking
Power:
Propulsion: 2,200hp (steady state) opposing piston hyperbar.
Transmission: Automatic (8 forward, 3 reverse).
Suspension: Hydractive
Power/Weight: 28.21hp/tonne
[link]
A main battle tank, made to be big, heavy and expensive by real world standards. There's a whole technical write-up for this thing, but that's too much - it has a 128mm solid propellant gun, a nice, thick layout of composite armour, an up to date fire control system, hyperbar engine with hydractive suspension and a solid APS. It *does* have a conventional transmission, and there're a host of other things I can improve - but that's what it's all about, I guess.
Related content
Comments: 10
YanuchiUchiha [2017-07-31 10:55:14 +0000 UTC]
Maybe a 125 mm gun is better due to the ammo being more common than a 128 mm ammo... [not that an adapter is hard to make...]
if it only was an actual tank used by an army
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SixthCircle In reply to YanuchiUchiha [2017-08-02 08:11:39 +0000 UTC]
Here, have a three point response!
- Alas, tank guns and the ammunition they fire are a bit more complex than making 'adaptors' - I can think of rather a lot of armies around the world who'd thank their lucky stars if it were that easy! Two illustrative examples make this clear. The first: the Japanese Type 90 tank has a 120mm gun just like its successor, the Type 10, but it's actually incapable of firing the ammunition developed for the Type 10 because its 120mm gun is incapable of handling the pressures of the new ammunition. The second: in trying to replace the rifled 120mm of the Challenger 2 with a smoothbore Rheinmetall 120m, the British found that there wasn't enough space in the Challenger turret as designed to store the one-piece ammunition of the new weapon (because the old weapon used two-piece ammunition).
- 125mm ammunition isn't actually that 'common'! Because of the limitations of various T-series autoloaders and the different ammunition that had to be designed for different tanks, there're a huge amount of different types of 125mm ammunition that isn't quite interchangeable between tanks. Legacy T-72s have incredibly cramped autoloaders, which means that they have to use shorter ammunition than that used on the T-80 series. Early T-90s use the same autoloader as the T-72 (being T-72s themselves), but later T-90s are rebuilt so that their autoloaders can handle T-80 length ammunition. Finally, the T-14, which stores its ammunition in a vertical turret autoloader and can handle longer ammunition than previous T-series iterations, is probably going to end up having its own new and incompatible series of ammunition, making the whole damn thing even more complex.
- Thankfully I designed the HT9A7 for a fictional world in which real world ammunition concerns aren't as valid! (though there are definitely those who opt for the conventional range of 105, 120, 125mm tank ammunition)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
YanuchiUchiha In reply to SixthCircle [2017-08-02 10:57:24 +0000 UTC]
I understand, but still... 125mm is more common that 128 mm
Besides, Yugoslavia's M-90 Vihor had an autoloader base on the Soviet one from the T-72, but completery redesigned and it's complexity reduced by 80% while the rate of fire has been increased by more than 30%
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SixthCircle In reply to Aliskus [2012-07-30 13:26:14 +0000 UTC]
It's a demining roller - puts pressure on stuff under it, and pressure on mines with the right fuzes makes them go 'boom'.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Aliskus In reply to SixthCircle [2012-08-01 07:26:24 +0000 UTC]
Ha,wow! Interesting... Great job
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
1




















