HOME | DD
Pete1987 β
xsquare
Published: 2011-12-25 14:59:52 +0000 UTC; Views: 5467; Favourites: 173; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Liège-Guillemins railway stationRelated content
Comments: 42
Interesting and congrats on the DD. This is a photograph? Where was this taken? Wow, impressive because of all the blinding lightness it has and all that white too boot (actually had to tilt my screen back a bit to see it). I think you should've darkened the structure or the white spaces around it to make it easy to see.
π: 0 β©: 1
It's taken at the Liège-Guillemins station in Belgium 
indees great picture! it's amazing what mirroreffect can do!
π: 0 β©: 1
This is awesome. I didn't realize it was a photograph at first.
π: 0 β©: 0
It got a DD because I thought it deserved a feature. You can send me a note and I'll be happy to discuss my choice.
π: 0 β©: 1
I just thought it was awfully simple is all.
π: 0 β©: 0
I'd love to see your architecture photography that's more deserving/amazing.
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't draw architecture. Is this architecture? It seemed like some sort of modern art.
Besides that, it also seems my comment has attracted quite a few defenders of this picture.
π: 0 β©: 1
It's a photograph of architecture, yes. Not a drawing.
Obviously, because it's an excellent photograph, and it's not the correct thing to do when you do not approve of a Daily Deviation. You should contact the person who featured it, don't write hateful messages to the artist who did not choose to be featured.
π: 0 β©: 2
His/her comment wasn't really hateful. S/He said s/he wondered how it got a DD, which is a legitimate statement. Although, in your defense, s/he should have looked at the category it was placed under, instead of assuming it was a drawing.
π: 0 β©: 1
That has nothing to do with the art itself and shouldn't be written to the artist, it's offensive to their work.
π: 0 β©: 2
Asking a question about an award for the art, does have something to do with the art. (Reference, "for the art.") If anything, your comment was the offensive one; "I'd love to see your architecture photography that's more deserving/amazing." His/her wondering of how it got a DD is no different from a person wondering how Picasso is famous for seemingly mediocre art, which I can assure you quite a few people wonder. Art is subjective, not objective, so if you wish this person to keep their opinion to his/herself, I recommend you lead by example.
π: 0 β©: 1
As I already said, this is not the correct place to ask about DDs, I'm only doing my job.
π: 0 β©: 1
"I'd love to see your architecture photography that's more deserving/amazing." This may just be me, but that doesn't sound like doing your job. That sounds like an insult.
π: 0 β©: 1
That was me doing my job indeed, because I knew they didn't know this was a photograph.
π: 0 β©: 1
I think someone's just in denial that they did their job wrong.
π: 0 β©: 1
Not at all. I had a very pleasant-ending conversation on this piece, and you're butthurt, but I'm not really sure why.
π: 0 β©: 0
I don't understand how the word 'how' in a simple question is so offensive, there's no need to get so defensive over a simple comment that even the artist doesn't care to answer.
If the artist isn't butthurt over the question there's no need for you to be.
π: 0 β©: 1
I am a community volunteer. It's my job to tell them where to go if they have an issue with our DDs, and this is not the place. The artist does not deserve this crap, they did not ask to be featured.
π: 0 β©: 1
So as a Community Volunteer you feel it's your job to tell people who ask simple non-offensive questions to 'STFU' if you're not going to praise it? Really? That sounds more like White-knighting. 
Well since it's your duty why don't you defend people who actually receive shit from others instead of just doing this on DD's?
Getting butthurt over that is just far more funny then offensive, you need to cool your heels and relax and wait when someone says 'What a piece of shit!' or just openly starts swearing at the artist. I mean it's no wonder why some people don't comment anymore, they get told off by easily butthurt users like yourself.
Hope I didn't turn your day into a tragedy!
π: 0 β©: 1
It wasn't non-offensive. 
π: 0 β©: 1
Pretty sure it is since the com-mentor didn't call it 'shit' or the like. You sure those are none of your comments being defensive over there?--> [link]
Sounds like white-knighting to me:
1. 'I'd love to see your architecture photography that's more deserving/amazing.'
(Lol, the usual 'if you're not good enough, you can't comment' excuse.)
2. 'Obviously, because it's an excellent photograph, and it's not the correct thing to do when you do not approve of a Daily Deviation. You should contact the person who featured it, don't write hateful messages to the artist who did not choose to be featured.'
(Wat? Lolz.)
3. 'I am a community volunteer. It's my job to tell them where to go if they have an issue with our DDs, and this is not the place. The artist does not deserve this crap, they did not ask to be featured.'
(Again, wat crap? The only thing this Artist doesn't deserve is you being overly sensitive over nothing.)
π: 0 β©: 1
A comment doesn't have to be flaming to be offensive. 
You're cute. Desperate, but cute.
π: 0 β©: 1
Here we go again, lol. Riiiight, you're obviously offended when it's not offended but whatever floats your boat, kiddo.
π: 0 β©: 1
If you have anything constructive to add, feel free to note me or my superiors instead of wasting space on this artist's page.
π: 0 β©: 0
This is a photograph? I suppose I must give it some credit then, I thought it was a vector of some sorts. I wonder what place that is.
π: 0 β©: 1
It says the place in the Artist's Comments. Liège-Guillemins railway station, which I believe to be in Belgium, but don't hold me to my word on that.
π: 0 β©: 1
Interesting. It looks impossibly clean.
π: 0 β©: 1
It does. @_@ I thought the same thing when I first saw it.
π: 0 β©: 1
Doesn't it look a little like a vector to you? I think it's easy to trick people with this.
π: 0 β©: 0
Are you kidding me? I've not seen an interior architecture picture like this before; it's pretty great.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yet so simple. No details or anything, just straight lines. The composition and monotonousness is nice though. It all depends on your taste in art, I never really liked that kind with a few multicolored shapes placed in areas combined with other shapes.
π: 0 β©: 0
I know this may sound dirty but the sides kind of resemble a certain female body part lol
π: 0 β©: 0
Hi there 
Your work was featured in our Inspirations Volume Six .
Have a great day!
π: 0 β©: 0
I don't understand where in the station you took this shot !! Great great shot
π: 0 β©: 1
