HOME | DD
Published: 2005-05-03 05:58:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 2740; Favourites: 40; Downloads: 290
Redirect to original
Description
Model: TinaPhotographer: me
I had a short photo session with this beautiful girl here... she's actually a second year medical school student.
As usual, comments, critiques, and suggestions are appreciated!
Related content
Comments: 43
lingk99 In reply to Codgo3master [2006-02-05 00:32:56 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! It was back when I first started photography, so it was more luck than talent. I'm glad you like it though! I hope you check out some of my other works and offer your comments/critiques.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Codgo3master In reply to lingk99 [2006-02-05 17:26:37 +0000 UTC]
Yes, they are very damn good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lingk99 In reply to Buuya [2006-02-05 00:33:52 +0000 UTC]
She is a gorgeous girl... seems like she popped out of Gray's Anatomy. You can find her at the UCSF's hospitals .
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FistfulOfSand [2005-07-26 06:05:01 +0000 UTC]
again, my dear, beautiful! beautiful model, and nice backround, the blurr and contrast is just right so it doesnt take the attention off of your subject. when i look at this, i think of the word "Life" her cheeks are flushed into that healthy pink, and the backround is just moving, and i seem to be drawn to her eyes, she's looking up and i have to wonder what she's looking at.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lingk99 In reply to FistfulOfSand [2005-07-26 06:23:39 +0000 UTC]
Wow, thank you for taking the time to look through my gallery. I'm currently looking at yours also .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
astraydreams [2005-06-06 15:29:27 +0000 UTC]
Excellent shot, she looks very beautiful. I love the lightening and her pose and expression.
Good job.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sunsetseason [2005-05-29 23:22:03 +0000 UTC]
this looks great!
beautiful model!
i love how the background is completely out of focus , but she is in perfect focus!
this looks like a magazine picture.!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lingk99 In reply to sunsetseason [2005-05-29 23:39:26 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, I like this picture a lot too! It's probably one of the best shots I've made both technically and aesthetically.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Balor-san [2005-05-26 20:15:55 +0000 UTC]
thats right, shes cute ^_^ photo also great! u use natural light or some additional stuff?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lingk99 In reply to Balor-san [2005-05-26 20:30:28 +0000 UTC]
Natural light + white reflector
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LDL [2005-05-23 21:06:55 +0000 UTC]
for me this one is my favourite in your gallery,
color harmony and tones are perfect !
Great work !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
imogene [2005-05-17 03:14:14 +0000 UTC]
Great portrait. The colors go so well with her skin and hair contrast. She's lovely.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lingk99 In reply to aleksandra [2005-05-13 20:37:31 +0000 UTC]
Thank you Ale! Your work is very inspiring to me actually... I'm just in awe at the quality of your work. Thank you for the fav on it too... I'm totally flattered.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
sisqo4u [2005-05-09 20:04:08 +0000 UTC]
wonderful shot ..
and what i like more about it .. it has dimensions
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lingk99 In reply to NUdES [2005-05-06 19:24:43 +0000 UTC]
Thanks man! I'm working on the story atm
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NUdES In reply to lingk99 [2005-05-06 19:31:45 +0000 UTC]
ur welcome..!! i am really excited...!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lingk99 In reply to blitzklick [2005-05-05 03:49:09 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for the nice compliment
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lingk99 In reply to snapdragon [2005-05-04 20:06:45 +0000 UTC]
Only thing I did in photoshop was to soften the face a bit (which I think almost all portrait photographers do nowadays). This way, you can keep the eyes and hair very sharp while having a soft complexion. If you do a soft focus while taking the picture (you can buy soft filters on the lens) or use an unsharp process in the raw edit modes, everything gets softened, which produces an angelic halo effect, but lack the quality and the detail you would see if you follow this process.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
akb-316 [2005-05-03 07:51:54 +0000 UTC]
model beautiful and the pose is just awesome.
I TOTALLY SEE YOU HAVE THE CANON DIGITAL REBEL XT...
I'm planning on getting one I'm saving money for it. May I ask how it is? I mostly do web stuff and prints (not too large) And I've been deciding between Nkon D70 and the XT but my own personal preference is always Canon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
lingk99 In reply to akb-316 [2005-05-03 08:00:41 +0000 UTC]
Oh, between D70 vs XT, I'd go XT
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lingk99 In reply to akb-316 [2005-05-03 08:00:00 +0000 UTC]
I love canon because I think they have nicer lenses. The XT is great... though there are some kinks to it that I don't mind exchanging to a D20 for. If you have the extra $500, then get the D20. Although it's heavier and clunkier sounding, it's slightly a worthier camera in terms of functionality and exposure balancing.
However, that said, my camera does fine for my needs . I think in the end, it's how to use the camera that counts. Read the reviews and decide for yourself. I think there's a review on the internet comparing the XT to D20.
If you're on a limited budget, then get the XT and spend the money on some nice sharp prime lenses. They're very worthwhile and can get a sharpness/contrast that sub $1000 zoom lenses can't.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
akb-316 In reply to lingk99 [2005-05-05 02:46:55 +0000 UTC]
yeah I've read LOTS of reviews as well and just to my own personal needs and conclusions I think I would get the XT
I may get another lens too as I save up along the way
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lingk99 In reply to akb-316 [2005-05-05 03:42:47 +0000 UTC]
At the minimum, if you want to do portraits, get the 50mm f/1.8. It's under $100!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
1


















