HOME | DD
Published: 2013-12-24 12:08:48 +0000 UTC; Views: 71725; Favourites: 1537; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Related content
Comments: 88
Trainwrekcomics [2023-03-23 03:39:41 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
Lober7 [2020-12-30 02:12:20 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 0
PinoyFish05 [2020-08-05 18:37:57 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
Coluber [2019-12-07 17:25:48 +0000 UTC]
What nation do these guys represent? I don't recognize the shield.
π: 0 β©: 2
Jjcheetah2 In reply to Coluber [2023-01-25 04:47:20 +0000 UTC]
π: 1 β©: 0
maidenfan2001 In reply to Coluber [2020-01-24 20:50:36 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
snarkyvampireboy101 [2018-08-26 18:52:06 +0000 UTC]
I quite like how the coat of arms changes... it's like a depiction of the same family over the years.
π: 1 β©: 1
Jjcheetah2 In reply to snarkyvampireboy101 [2023-01-25 04:47:37 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
Lemniskate [2018-04-16 07:47:30 +0000 UTC]
It's as if between the last two stages there'd been a paradigm shift :3
π: 0 β©: 2
Jjcheetah2 In reply to Lemniskate [2023-01-25 04:47:46 +0000 UTC]
π: 0 β©: 0
Stargazzer811 In reply to Lemniskate [2018-05-12 08:02:36 +0000 UTC]
There was. By 1610 firearms had been invented, and most European powers were scrambling to adopt them in some form. Gone were the days of the fully clad knight, and in their place you saw soldiers in lighter but better built armor that covered the vital organs and head while giving them more flexibility.
π: 0 β©: 0
Dinopithecus [2018-03-14 19:40:50 +0000 UTC]
Awesome! It's nice to see centuries worth of armored soldiers lined up for comparison.
What's the red thing the 1330 knight is wearing on his torso? Is that just cloth or is that actually armor? It looks more like the latter to me, resembling brigandine the most, but I'm not 100% sure.
π: 0 β©: 1
Stargazzer811 In reply to Dinopithecus [2018-05-12 08:02:50 +0000 UTC]
You are correct, that is a brigandine.
π: 1 β©: 0
FiliusTonitrui [2017-10-31 22:34:45 +0000 UTC]
Thia is one of the best images I have ever seen. Thanks man
π: 0 β©: 0
Baron-von-Blau [2017-08-01 13:38:26 +0000 UTC]
This is very informative. I hadn't realized that full plate armour had come so late, relatively speaking. Thank you for creating this.
π: 0 β©: 0
PizzaPiss [2017-07-14 20:09:19 +0000 UTC]
More like a DEvolution at the end.
It's so sad that there is no today's equivalent to the old full body Plate Armour in terms of being combat-worthy...
π: 0 β©: 0
HerbyFox [2017-06-07 19:23:26 +0000 UTC]
As soon as guns appeared...armour just went out the window
π: 0 β©: 1
BohemianWolfPrince In reply to HerbyFox [2017-06-11 23:02:16 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Admin
π: 0 β©: 1
Pootisman90 In reply to BohemianWolfPrince [2017-07-19 16:56:08 +0000 UTC]
In fact, plate armor was made to be bulletproof. And then the pikes came, and it began being "Pike magnet".
π: 0 β©: 1
BohemianWolfPrince In reply to Pootisman90 [2017-07-19 17:22:34 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Admin
π: 0 β©: 1
cursedironfist7 In reply to BohemianWolfPrince [2017-12-04 04:47:40 +0000 UTC]
and it was also in part due to economics. good armor let alone a set that could stop a matchlock bullet was incredibly expensive. only the top brass could afford a bulletproof cuirass and still be able to afford everything else
π: 0 β©: 0
Mustache-Twirler [2016-10-31 16:22:55 +0000 UTC]
I really love this post you did on the evolution of Knightly armour.
Actually, I need to thank you for this sheet since it was one of the results I found on google when I was searching for a chart of different armors for each century when I was developing one of my characters a while back. I also wanted to to give you credit for the inspiration by this for one of my posts.
π: 0 β©: 0
SolidSamurai [2016-07-10 20:51:49 +0000 UTC]
I was thinking the 1250 knight would have a larger shield if anything, to stop clubs and sling stones.Β Because chainmail doesn't really protect against impacts.Β He might also have looked fatter if he had a thick gambeson underneath.
According to wiki the kite shield was 'completely phased out by 1300' due to the fact that leg armor got good enough.Β My guess is that throughout 13th century, there would have been pavisses and such, leading to a reduction in the popularity of kite shields (the main consumer being troop formations).Β Any particularly brazen knights fighting out in the open probably still used them until that cutting off point (1300 AD).
π: 0 β©: 0
Corporal-Yakob [2016-06-15 16:44:03 +0000 UTC]
Cool! I do like how the chronology cuts off before the 18 and 19th centuries, skipping the brilliant successors to practical armour, like "Brightly coloured shirt" and "Uncomfortably tight pantaloons".
π: 0 β©: 1
BohemianWolfPrince In reply to Corporal-Yakob [2017-06-11 23:06:37 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Admin
π: 0 β©: 0
arbiterofelegance [2015-11-25 19:17:26 +0000 UTC]
this is such an informative and educational work of art. it would be cool to see versions for say, cavalry, archers, pikemen, and the like
π: 0 β©: 0
Skoshi8 [2015-10-18 19:33:26 +0000 UTC]
Dropping the steel helmet from the 1650s to WWI was probably not a good idea.
π: 0 β©: 2
belianis In reply to Skoshi8 [2015-11-01 15:20:16 +0000 UTC]
Indeed! Three pointed hats, shakos and kepis offered no protectionΒ for the head; even the original pickelhaube was only made of leather.
π: 0 β©: 1
BohemianWolfPrince In reply to belianis [2017-06-11 23:13:06 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Admin
π: 0 β©: 0
1 | Next =>


















