HOME | DD
Published: 2014-11-27 04:39:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 4686; Favourites: 121; Downloads: 47
Redirect to original
Description
I almost wanted to call this image the "fatman" because of the bulky look that makes you amazed that it actually flies, but hey this is the Marines F-35B with VTOL capability, and I liked the thick lines on the body, almost like muscles. I hope you like this work regardless of what you think about the jet.ΒRelated content
Comments: 53
Kiba928 [2014-12-04 13:55:22 +0000 UTC]
Ah, the billion-dollar paperweight. What a POS plane. Great art though, well done!
π: 0 β©: 1
Distantstarr In reply to chloeeuphemissoledad [2014-12-04 16:40:45 +0000 UTC]
Glad you like it
π: 0 β©: 0
fishofglass In reply to Distantstarr [2015-01-01 03:41:15 +0000 UTC]
great!
i cannot but admire your talented!
π: 0 β©: 1
Distantstarr In reply to fishofglass [2015-01-03 21:48:13 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much, I appreciate it
π: 0 β©: 0
Distantstarr In reply to RUShorty [2014-12-01 09:25:45 +0000 UTC]
agree and thank you.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
F-NAR In reply to TheFellowWithTheHat [2014-11-30 10:28:35 +0000 UTC]
just a quick question, What is it with people calling the F-35 "Fat Man". I mean I don't get the reference.
π: 0 β©: 1
F-NAR In reply to TheFellowWithTheHat [2014-11-30 20:59:09 +0000 UTC]
you got a point there. It is a kinda stocky looking jet, even in person it looks rather bulking. I just thought that you were referencing something like a article or someone else art that's all. thanks for the explanation though. Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Distantstarr In reply to TheFellowWithTheHat [2014-11-28 07:25:25 +0000 UTC]
are you humming a song, Sir?
π: 0 β©: 1
TheFellowWithTheHat In reply to Distantstarr [2014-11-28 18:45:07 +0000 UTC]
Hidden by Admin
π: 0 β©: 0
Kalash1947 [2014-11-27 18:58:14 +0000 UTC]
They train the pilots for these, along with the first classes of Israeli and English F-35 pilots, just down the road from my home town at Eglin Air Force Base. Personally not too fond of it, but for the Marines, it provides a vast improvement over the old AV-8B.
π: 0 β©: 1
RUShorty In reply to Kalash1947 [2014-12-02 10:46:50 +0000 UTC]
Harrier certainly looked better and had more character.
π: 0 β©: 0
ArtistNumber3 [2014-11-27 15:23:18 +0000 UTC]
FatmanΒ Β great work! You should try making one when its landing (VSTOL model).Β Β
π: 0 β©: 1
Distantstarr In reply to ArtistNumber3 [2014-11-27 22:24:01 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, will consider it
π: 0 β©: 0
paws4thot [2014-11-27 12:35:17 +0000 UTC]
Nice, particularly the very organic changes of colour.
I have a particular love of watching the main engine exhaust nozzle transitioning between forward flight and VL mode and back.
π: 0 β©: 1
mildirk [2014-11-27 12:09:02 +0000 UTC]
F-35 is ugly on some angles, sleek on other angles. I think you've captured quite well the sleekness of this flying brick .
π: 0 β©: 1
F-NAR [2014-11-27 09:33:01 +0000 UTC]
you do such beautiful work, the Lightning II's in this pic look really life like.
π: 0 β©: 1
Distantstarr In reply to F-NAR [2014-11-27 22:24:54 +0000 UTC]
It is from a real photo, thank you
π: 0 β©: 1
F-NAR In reply to Distantstarr [2014-11-28 00:23:03 +0000 UTC]
well you still did a great job nonetheless!
π: 0 β©: 1
Philamanian [2014-11-27 09:01:38 +0000 UTC]
The plane is a great concept, but it's execution is horrible. There was way too much money put into this program, so much so that the cost would probably outweigh the benefits. I mean, I love everything about this plane, except for the way it is implemented into the military.
Still, this is just an awesome pic. I'd love to see more F-35s, but I'm always in awe with the pictures you make, no matter what it is. Keep up the great work!
π: 0 β©: 1
Distantstarr In reply to Philamanian [2014-11-27 22:25:07 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for liking it
π: 0 β©: 0
FluffyLover1986 [2014-11-27 05:32:48 +0000 UTC]
Total hate for the F-35 for one simple reason:
They stopped producing the F-22 for THIS turkey?! Are you kidding me?!
As a fighter, it's far inferior to the F-22. Slower, less maneuverable, the works.
As ground support, it's far inferior to the A-10 (armor over thin-skinned stealth against ground fire please).
Finally, after all is said and done, its per-unit flyaway is quickly approaching that of the Raptor anyway, which was cited as being too expensive.
That the F-22 doesn't really have all that much of a mission because nobody fields an air force while F-15s, 16s, and 18s can take care of all air-to-ground is a *good* thing.
There was no need to create this attempt to please everyone and get an overcosted thin-skinned stealth missile truck.
π: 0 β©: 2
paws4thot In reply to FluffyLover1986 [2014-11-27 12:32:10 +0000 UTC]
Tell you what; land an F-22 with a 100 foot roll-out from "weight on wheels" to stationary, then we'll talk.
Off-topic, but I like your signature.
π: 0 β©: 0
Distantstarr In reply to Siiver7 [2014-11-27 07:02:49 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for liking it
π: 0 β©: 0
1 | Next =>




















