HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| Princess-Amy
# Statistics
Favourites: 42; Deviations: 1337; Watchers: 1451
Watching: 360; Pageviews: 232596; Comments Made: 108183; Friends: 360
# Comments
Comments: 14494
pearwood [2026-01-13 23:04:46 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FeynaSkydancer [2025-12-14 15:10:42 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Phraggle [2025-12-12 15:14:24 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Bnspyrd [2025-10-21 03:50:38 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BridgertonTea [2025-10-17 17:07:47 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Princess-Amy In reply to BridgertonTea [2025-10-17 17:10:34 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
BridgertonTea In reply to Princess-Amy [2025-10-17 17:11:38 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
DocHardy [2025-10-16 06:13:00 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Citysnaps [2025-10-04 14:21:48 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
EmpressAnastasia434 [2025-08-26 07:45:46 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Princess-Amy In reply to EmpressAnastasia434 [2025-10-04 11:28:50 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MayGoldworthy [2025-08-14 19:39:27 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Princess-Amy In reply to MayGoldworthy [2025-08-15 03:43:39 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
MayGoldworthy In reply to Princess-Amy [2025-08-15 20:39:35 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MichaelBilyk [2025-08-14 18:26:18 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Princess-Amy In reply to MichaelBilyk [2025-08-14 18:27:58 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
BubbleDriver [2025-08-14 05:19:55 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Princess-Amy In reply to BubbleDriver [2025-08-14 06:48:02 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
pearwood [2024-09-24 01:46:38 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pearwood [2023-06-06 20:45:11 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
davincipoppalag [2022-08-23 00:06:06 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Princess-Amy In reply to davincipoppalag [2022-08-23 14:19:44 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pearwood [2022-08-20 16:04:56 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Princess-Amy In reply to pearwood [2022-08-21 05:36:16 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pearwood [2022-04-07 18:37:06 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pearwood [2020-12-29 02:01:18 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
samo19 [2020-02-03 13:03:25 +0000 UTC]
your gallery is fantastic, many thanks for share so much beauty
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BricksandStones [2019-12-13 21:50:18 +0000 UTC]
Happy Birthday! All the best from the Middle-East!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ingeline-art [2019-12-13 18:08:46 +0000 UTC]
Happy birthday to you and
have a wonderful day!
Greetings and hugs from cologne
Ingeline-art ))
This is only for you!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MrWitchblade [2019-12-06 17:34:03 +0000 UTC]
It's your Birthday soon, but will you be on D.A. to party?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Princess-Amy In reply to Tinselfire [2019-01-10 12:46:27 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tinselfire In reply to Princess-Amy [2019-01-10 12:58:19 +0000 UTC]
No indoor flash against bright backgrounds, no face-deforming odd angles, no watercolour filters, no grainy duplicates of the same cappuccino...
Hate to be the bearer of ill news, but if you are going to be the worst photographer on Deviantart, you got a lot of work ahead of you.
Seriously, though -.o Great gallery.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Princess-Amy In reply to Tinselfire [2019-01-10 18:46:40 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tinselfire In reply to Princess-Amy [2019-01-17 00:23:21 +0000 UTC]
Used the same camera since 2009 myself. It has one dial - which I am very careful not to turn to any other settings than "photograph" or "display", lest it may explode for all I know.
That sounds like an interesting idea, although the practical aspects of it may be a bit nebulous.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Princess-Amy In reply to Tinselfire [2019-01-17 06:46:39 +0000 UTC]
When I came to Deviantart, I had no clue.
Then I learned film photography, Then Digital.
I now have an assortment of cameras and lenses that I know how to use.
What camera have you?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tinselfire In reply to Princess-Amy [2019-01-17 09:07:48 +0000 UTC]
Know that feeling well, if in a different area. If you had asked me about reflected light and haze two years ago, I'd have had no clue.
An Olympus Micro-9000.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Princess-Amy In reply to Tinselfire [2019-01-20 17:34:11 +0000 UTC]
LMAO! I'm still terrible at using reflected light.
Just googled that, Nice lil compact!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tinselfire In reply to Princess-Amy [2019-01-22 17:01:07 +0000 UTC]
It certainly is. Of course, most of the other digital cameras I've used are from the absolute infancy of commercially available digital photography, so have little to compare to. But for what I need, it is good enough and more.
The only problem I have had is regardless of capture mode, it treats atmosphere very starkly. Outdoor scenes always end up tinted bluish, indoor scenes have a cadmium glow to them, and so forth. But mostly using it to shoot references, I usually don't mind: So long as arms and legs go where they are supposed to, all is well.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Princess-Amy In reply to Tinselfire [2019-01-23 06:35:53 +0000 UTC]
That just sounds like the white balance is set wrong. If yu change it to auto it might wok out better
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tinselfire In reply to Princess-Amy [2019-01-23 18:37:49 +0000 UTC]
Tried changing it. While I failed to change it for the better, it did change at all, which is a whole lot more development than the past decade. I pretty much have no photography vocabulary - never heard of white balance before - so I'm surprised and glad you could spot it from the description. Thanks for suggesting!
Although I realise now, if there would seriously be an event to pass on the title of "worst photographer" my chance to grab the crown just shrunk...
Totally worth it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>