HOME | DD
ase2000 β Wait a minute...
Published: 2024-08-22 19:00:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 1709; Favourites: 13; Downloads: 3
Redirect to original
Description
find me on X: https://x.com/ase2000x
Related content
Comments: 16
qwertz-a [2024-11-14 21:27:54 +0000 UTC]
No they call it a lie but lie implies there a nugget of truth
π: 0 β©: 0
ArgonautStudios [2024-09-02 18:38:07 +0000 UTC]
yeah but something like "White House representatives are lizard people" doesn't sound so true does it?
π: 0 β©: 2
FilterRePhilltered In reply to ArgonautStudios [2025-01-27 13:23:38 +0000 UTC]
Lizard people are implausible but not impossible.
Things like media control on the other hand are not just plausible, but potentially more efficient than objective truth. How else do you keep people believing in the system while despising it?
π: 0 β©: 1
ArgonautStudios In reply to FilterRePhilltered [2025-01-27 15:07:55 +0000 UTC]
by listening to the actual witnesses of said event
π: 0 β©: 1
FilterRePhilltered In reply to ArgonautStudios [2025-01-27 22:46:15 +0000 UTC]
Said witnesses are always represented by said sources. And don't forget we are human. We are driven by stories. How many famous myths were driven by a mix of truth and fabrication?
π: 0 β©: 0
DuckOwner In reply to ArgonautStudios [2024-11-26 10:53:34 +0000 UTC]
that stuff is well poisoning
π: 0 β©: 0
adpf [2024-08-24 17:20:42 +0000 UTC]
Conspiracy: "When people conspire together to do something."
Read a book.
π: 0 β©: 1
Phracker In reply to adpf [2024-10-11 21:15:02 +0000 UTC]
Okay, you do understand that words can have more than one meaning, right? There can also be a formal meaning and a colloquial meaning of a term. It doesn't have to come out of a textbook to be logically valid.
π: 0 β©: 0
ChrisY-DA [2024-08-24 10:48:59 +0000 UTC]
Correction: They always call it "propaganda" before they call it a lie.
π: 0 β©: 0
SirDoc [2024-08-24 05:12:26 +0000 UTC]
Generally it's kinder to assume someone is honestly mistaken rather than a liar.
π: 0 β©: 1
Phracker In reply to SirDoc [2024-10-11 21:16:24 +0000 UTC]
Except when it comes to the people trying to rig the system against you, giving them the benefit of the doubt can be outright dangerous. It's better to err on the side of caution than to err on the side of trust, especially when you're dealing with people who have already demonstrated that they are not trustworthy.
π: 1 β©: 1
LexingtonDeville In reply to Holokin [2024-10-12 09:15:20 +0000 UTC]
So there isnβt a conspiracy for us to βOwn nothing and be happyβ come 2030 ala the WEF, is there?
π: 0 β©: 1
BH6429 In reply to LexingtonDeville [2024-12-31 01:34:45 +0000 UTC]
Not unless the conspiracy is ignoranceβ¦
π: 0 β©: 0
1

















