HOME | DD

ase2000 avatar

ase2000 — Hmm...


Hmm...
Published: 2024-11-29 04:00:11 +0000 UTC; Views: 4559; Favourites: 22; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description

find me on X: https://x.com/ase2000x

Related content
Comments: 25

PhrackerPhracker [2026-09-10 18:01:34 +0000 UTC]

Phracker - Republicans Right Now

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BodaciousCrumbBodaciousCrumb [2026-06-29 12:17:28 +0000 UTC]

But, you do think that people ought to be treated differently based on their race. Don't you, Nick Wilde in a Trump hat.
I'm about as convinced by this as I was with the "i don't see color" people.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

FlameGirl3770FlameGirl3770 [2025-08-29 16:25:42 +0000 UTC]

Nice misinformation lil' bro and the same can be said for Anti-SJWs when seeing a character who isn't white.

👍: 4 ⏩: 1

WhoJustFatpostedWhoJustFatposted In reply to FlameGirl3770 [2026-05-06 05:38:58 +0000 UTC]

Two things can be true at the same time. Proper SJW's are moral narcissists trying to push bad things by pretending to stand for whatever moral standard is cool and trendy in the moment. Then anti-SJW's are anti-moralist contrarians that specifically get out of their way to attack anything SJW's claim they have come to protect.

Both cliques are like nuisance streamers, except they hide behind bandwagons to avoid individual accountability.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SonicHelperHi09SonicHelperHi09 In reply to WhoJustFatposted [2026-07-10 19:46:54 +0000 UTC]

Well, obsessive anti-SJWs, anyway. They're just as bad, just as toxic, and just as annoying as SJWs, if not a little worse, a little more toxic, and a little more annoying than SJWs. Obsessive anti-SJWs are SJWs, but of a different side. And yes, I'm against SJWs and obsessive anti-SJWs equally. But we need to remember that not all anti-SJWs are obsessive anti-SJWs.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

thisisntarealnamethisisntarealname [2025-08-23 15:25:47 +0000 UTC]

You've really got to give your stuff better titles, you know that? Because almost every one of them has a title like "Hmmm" or "aha", "true", or "yep". If someone wants to find something specific they saw earlier in this mess that is your portfolio, they're not going to be able to.

👍: 3 ⏩: 0

DuckOwnerDuckOwner [2025-05-18 06:43:14 +0000 UTC]

i just want the right to have my own cultural identity and be proud of it without facing hostility from society at large, the way all of the other races get to be celebrated.

👍: 5 ⏩: 1

SillyIncubusSillyIncubus In reply to DuckOwner [2025-05-19 10:34:01 +0000 UTC]

You already have it.

👍: 3 ⏩: 1

TheAntsaBoy94TheAntsaBoy94 In reply to SillyIncubus [2026-05-19 22:59:50 +0000 UTC]

No he doesn't. He's white.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

SillyIncubusSillyIncubus In reply to TheAntsaBoy94 [2026-05-20 03:34:47 +0000 UTC]

Yes he does. He's white.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

Bug-OffBug-Off [2025-05-07 20:22:56 +0000 UTC]

Strawman.

👍: 5 ⏩: 1

thisisntarealnamethisisntarealname In reply to Bug-Off [2025-08-23 15:44:51 +0000 UTC]

Strawman doesn't mean incorrect though. It's funny how accurate I have seen the right's strawmen of the left consistently are, while how ill-fitting the left's strawmen of the right are because the right has actual variety. There's a lot of difference between the religious right and the libertarian right, the only common theme is they don't want an oppressive government micromanaging them. But all the leftists are almost exactly the same, largely because they're literally collectivists, what's the gamut of variety there, Killary Clinton to Bernie Sanders? Whether they hate men, white people or capitalism the most? Conservative memes don't even need to use hyperboles, when the reality is ridiculous enough. The only time they're ever any different is when they're cynical of their own side like Bill Maher.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bug-OffBug-Off In reply to thisisntarealname [2025-08-23 23:53:52 +0000 UTC]

I don't care about all that. This is a strawman.

👍: 4 ⏩: 0

PhrackerPhracker [2025-05-01 01:59:24 +0000 UTC]

Oh look, another strawman.

👍: 7 ⏩: 1

ase2000ase2000 In reply to Phracker [2025-05-01 02:25:32 +0000 UTC]

Do you support DEI? Because if you do, then this is in fact not a strawman.

👍: 5 ⏩: 3

qwertz-aqwertz-a In reply to ase2000 [2025-07-11 07:57:41 +0000 UTC]

It actually is 28 children died because of that strawman there’s not a place in hell deep enough for maga

👍: 4 ⏩: 0

ase2000ase2000 In reply to ryu238 [2025-05-14 20:21:10 +0000 UTC]

Reddit link.

👍: 3 ⏩: 1

ryu238ryu238 In reply to ase2000 [2025-05-14 20:33:01 +0000 UTC]

Ad hominem.

👍: 3 ⏩: 0

PhrackerPhracker In reply to ase2000 [2025-05-01 13:18:18 +0000 UTC]

I'm talking about calling someone a Nazi because they're against PC politics. Leftists call right-wingers Nazis because they believe bullshit theories about "white genocide" and stuff like that, not because they're anti-PC.

👍: 4 ⏩: 1

DuckOwnerDuckOwner In reply to Phracker [2025-05-18 06:45:29 +0000 UTC]

white genocide is absolutely real but you don't want to acknowledge it because your world view will not let you accept whites as victims, because that would take away from their ability to be your oppressors. truth is that all races are being shafted by the little hat tribe

👍: 3 ⏩: 2

qwertz-aqwertz-a In reply to DuckOwner [2025-07-11 07:58:29 +0000 UTC]

It isn’t, white people have increased in number

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PhrackerPhracker In reply to DuckOwner [2025-05-19 07:22:35 +0000 UTC]

White people being allowed to reproduce with nonwhite people is not genocide, dipshit.

Also, what's this "little hat tribe" you speak of? Are you talking about Jews perchance? I'm not quite familiar with this particular dog whistle, but based on my knowledge of white genocide theories and who the boogeyman in these narratives usually is, I'm guessing you're probably talking about Jews.

EDIT: Oh wait, "little hat" = the yarmulke. So yeah, you're talking about Jews.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

fly-diyfly-diy In reply to Phracker [2025-05-19 20:22:11 +0000 UTC]

It doesn't help those "right-wingers" case, their adherence to conspiracy theories anent the Jews. Really doesn't help their case.

👍: 1 ⏩: 0


1